The Importance Of Dialogues And Multilogues
The other thing leaders need to understand is that cell phones and other forms of technology can result in being constantly distracted from the present moment, and from the important work of making connections with people. As Margaret Wheatley points out, “Only use processes that bring people together in mutual respect. No othering or distancing from one another. We start and end as equals…. Conversations is the technology. Curiosity, vulnerability, mutual respect give it power.”
From my professional experiences of working with great leaders, I have witnessed that being fully present with others means creating quality time for sharing, listening, and learning, which creates a deeper level of understanding, knowledge, and perspective. It also provides us with the opportunity to be mindfully evolving our own capacity to lead and serve others.
Yet, for this to happen on an on-going basis, we need to engage in dialogues and multilogues on a routine basis. The word dialogue comes the Greek language meaning dia through and logus word. It is a conversation between two people, focusing on the exchange of words and ideas. I have often seen this done well during regular coaching and check-in sessions.
Multilogue, on the other hand, is a conversation involving three or more participants, often characterized as many-to-many rather than a two-person dialogue. It allows for multiple and diverse voices and perspectives to be heard, and it is a safe space for co-creation and in-depth collaboration. While a dialogue is often between two people, a multilogue, or sometimes called a polylogue, describes a larger group interaction, which, over time, can build ownership and a strategic level mindset. I have often seen this done well during regular strategic reviews and during in-depth strategic planning.
When I think about dialogues and multilogues, I have to remember that I was raised in a print culture, i.e. books, newspapers, articles, etc., with a general societal focus on continuity, uniformity, and repeatability. I even remember the Dewy Decimal System and using the card catalog at the local library. However, we now live in a time period of AI, Chat GPT, algorithms, and internet searches, all of which have the potential to create discontinuity, ambiguity, and multiple networks of interactions in order to find key information, develop a plan, or quickly adapt a plan that is already being executed.
Given this wide diversity of life experiences within the current workforce, the best leaders, who recognize that everything changes over time, do not focus on one of the aforementioned differences as being good and the other as being bad or old fashion. Instead, they recognize that the world of effective leadership is built on working within an interconnected whole rather than just defining it as a collection of entities, teams, or people. The combination of dialogues and multilogues creates an interconnected whole with a direct connection to the strategic nexus, namely the sum of mission, vision and core values plus the current strategic plan.
The Challenge of Armor
Still, when leaders approach people and change from a binary perspective, namely done vs not done, they invariably end up armoring up to protect themself from others. They do this, because they frame resistance and the feeling of things being chaotic as a problem rather than as a normal part of the overall change process. BrenĂ© Brown in her book, Strong Ground: The Lessons Of Daring Leadership, The Tenacity Of Paradox, and The Wisdom Of The Human Spirit (Random House, 2025), writes “The big learning from the original research and substantiated by every study we’ve done since is that the real barrier to daring leadership is armor - the thoughts, emotions, and behaviors that we use to protect ourselves when weren’t willing and able to rumble with vulnerability.” Then, with their armor on as form of self-protection, they are ready to do battle with everyone and every thing around them. The result is that kindness, respect, compassion, and collaboration fall by the wayside in one’s expectations and efforts to generate perfect levels of control, order, and predictability.
Nevertheless, I can hear executive coaches advising clients to take off their armor in order to be more effective. Yet, taking off this amor can feel chaotic if not even a crisis for many leaders. They put on the armor, consciously or unconsciously, because they did not feel safe. They also put it on, because, on one level, they did have the tools or the mindset to “rumble with vulnerability.” For them, the armor is the solution to a problem, and the problem is fear. As BrenĂ© Brown notes, “At the heart of daring leadership is a deeply human truth that is rarely acknowledged, especially at work: Courage and fear are not mutually exclusive. Most of us feel brave and afraid at the exact same time. Sometimes all day long.”
Therefore, we need to create the conditions for people to feel safe at the individual and group or team levels. This involves building trust, and thoughtful connections. We also need to provide them with the tools and perspective to deal with fear, vulnerability, and unpredictability. Otherwise, the choice will be put on armor, and focus on controlling everything and everyone around us.
There also is one more thing we need to do. As James Kouzes and Barry Posner in their book, A Leader’s Legacy (Jossey-Bass, 2006), explain, “Speaking of the truth, for each individual, the most important leader in any organization is not the CEO, or the head honcho; it’s the leader we see most often, the one we turn to when we need guidance and support.” They then note, the “... single best predictor of career success is the relationship they had with their very first supervisor…. The leaders who have the most influence on us are those who are closest to us.”
And when we armor up, and then engage with others, we are not going to be seen as someone who can offer guidance and support. We also will not be seen as someone who cares and understands the challenges of working within complexity. In short, our lack of vulnerability will be framed as a barrier rather than an asset.
So, in order to help leaders take off their armor and become the kind of people who others are willing to follow, Kouzes and Posner remind us that “leadership development is first and foremost self-development.” And when this in-depth self-development process takes place, Kouzes and Posner write, “Leadership is courage in action…. Leadership is a humbling experience…. When we choose to lead every day, we choose to serve. Leading is not about what we gain from others but what others gain from us.” And serving others is vital to dealing with the convergence of complexity and rapid intensification.
Simplify, Simplify, Simplify
“It’s really easy to complicate your life,” writes Yvon Chouinard, founder of Patagonia. “It’s a lot harder to simplify it.” Nevertheless, that is exactly what we need to do at this time period.
Currently, we live in a world where multiple factors are causing everything to feel and be chaotic. While we wish this could all change overnight, leaders understand that this is a pipe dream rather than the reality within which they work and live. They also understand that in order for us to be effective, and, at times, efficient, we need to accept the fact that everything changes. And some days, these changes are adaptive and other days they are evolutionary. But in the end, change is the constant in the world of leadership.
Therefore, when things feel chaotic and are chaotic, we must change our inscape in order to better lead within the landscape of our lives. We must prepare for, and recognize the conditions that generate rapid intensification. We must create the time and space for more dialogues and multilogues in order to create greater levels of clarity, commitment, and engagement. We also must recognize that the armor we put on and wear, consciously or unconsciously, does not always serve us well or generate respectful and meaningful connections with others.
If our goal in the midst of all this change is to respond rather than to react, and to build safe and trusting work environments, where all involved can create solutions which are owned and understood by the people who have to execute them, then we must calm our minds and be fully present to people around us. For when we do this, something important happens. As Joey Reiman, professor at Emory’s Business School, wrote: “If you can change your mind, you can change the world.” And that is what we are trying to do while everything changes all around us.
© Geery Howe 2026